Skip to main content

DOJ NEWS: From the GOA; Trump/Bondi Backtracking? Let's Take A LOOK

By Gregory Kielma

Featured image for DOJ NEWS: From the GOA; Trump/Bondi Backtracking? Let's Take A LOOK

Extremely Troublesome Department Of Justice Brief Draws Stark Warning From GOA

Extremely Troublesome Department Of Justice Brief Draws Stark Warning From GOA
Mark Chesnut 

A bold brief, recently filed by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in a case challenging the National Firearms Act (NFA), has one gun-rights organization sounding an alarm.

According to Gun Owners of America (GOA), on November 20, the DOJ, in the case Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF, filed an “outrageous brief that embraces an alarmingly expansive theory of federal authority.” That assertion runs directly afoul of President Donald Trump’s promise to protect the Second Amendment for all Americans.

In responding to GOA and GOF’s “One Big Beautiful Lawsuit,” the DOJ treats Congress’ removal of the historic $200 tax as a pretext to rewrite the limits of congressional power, advancing an argument that would open the door to federal regulation far beyond anything the Framers intended.

“GOA and GOF condemn Attorney General Pam Bondi and President Trump’s Department of Justice (DOJ) for doubling down on enforcement of an archaic and unconstitutional law while simultaneously offering legal theories that would expand federal power to historic levels,” GOA said in a news release revealing the DOJ’s actions. “This is especially striking from an administration that had promised to respect the Second Amendment and review burdensome agency rules.”

As GOA further explained, the implications of the DOJ’s stance are immediate and ominous.